Neuroscience Journal Club Feedback Form Presenter Name First Last Presenter's Email* Course Directors, Drs. Rosa Guzzo & Paola Bargagna-Mohan will automatically receive a copy of this form upon submission.1. Was the presentation clearly organized?* 1 (outstanding) 2 3 4 5 (poor) 2. Was it evident that the presenter had spent time preparing the presentation?* 1 (outstanding) 2 3 4 5 (poor) 3. Could you understand the presenter (spoke clearly and was articulate)?* 1 (outstanding) 2 3 4 5 (poor) 4. Was the presenter able to adequately describe and/or justify the techniques and methods used in the studies presented?* 1 (outstanding) 2 3 4 5 (poor) 5. Did the presenter manage time effectively?* 1 (outstanding) 2 3 4 5 (poor) 6. How well did the presenter answer questions? Did presenter repeat the question?* 1 (outstanding) 2 3 4 5 (poor) 7. Did the presenter provide an interpretation and/or explanation of the data? and/or a statement on the impact/importance of the article?* 1 (outstanding) 2 3 4 5 (poor) 8. If a journal presentation, did the presenter provide an appropriate critique of the manuscript?* 1 (outstanding) 2 3 4 5 (poor) Additional comments:Survey completed by:* First Last If you prefer to remain anonymous, please list "anonymous" in the first/last name fields. However, students must list their name if they wish to receive credit for completing this feedback form.Your category is:*FacultyPost docStudentOtherPhoneThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.